Review Lovelace-UK-quad-Poster, movie review world

Published on September 10th, 2013 | by Allan Brown


Lovelace Review


Movie Review: Lovelace (2013)lovelace-film-poster-amanda-seyfried-movie-review-world

Running Time: 93 mins

Rating: 18

Directors: Rob Epstein, Jeffrey Friedman

Writer: Andy Bellin

Cast: Amanda Seyfried, James Franco, Peter Sarsgaard, Sharon Stone, Juno Temple, Sharon Stone, Robert Patrick, Bobby Cannavale

Plot: A biopic following the troubled life of 70s porn icon Linda Lovelace and the abuse she met at the hands of her husband Chuck Traynor.



Movie Review World

Documentary filmmaking duo Rob Epstein and Jeffrey Friedman present their first feature length movie, based on the infamous career of 70s porn starlet and Deep Throat actress Linda Boreman aka Linda Lovelace. The film is based on Linda’s autobiography entitled ORDEAL and catalogues her rise to fame, from her wholesome beginnings, all the way to her abrupt exit from the industry a mere 17 days later. However, this film biography is most notably a story of the abuse Linda endured, not only from the porn industry itself, but at the hands of her husband Chuck Traynor, during their turbulent 6 year relationship.


The film showcases two separate perceptions of the Linda Lovelace story. For the first hour we are shown things from the public’s point of view showcasing Linda’s sharp rise to celebrity status as well as the impact the Deep Throat movie had on the world at that time. The Second story, we see things from Linda’s own and often quite harrowing point of view, as we witness the ordeal she went through whilst with her husband and self-appointed manager, Chuck Traynor.

Because of the sudden tonal narrative shift it leaves it hard to invest emotionally in any of the characters

While this aspect of the story is certainly insightful and matched with a chilling performance from Peter Sarsgaard, from a narrative perspective the approach is perhaps a little jarring. The first segment is fun, full of energy and light hearted. The second (the one we all came to see), brutal and unflinching, but to start the main story after an hour of what feels like a collection of celebrity news reels ultimately leaves little time in the 93 min run to develop this chapter adequately.

the-real-linda-lovelace-and-amanda-seyfried-comparison-movie-review-world Because of the sudden tonal narrative shift it leaves it hard to invest emotionally in any of the characters. So what we are presented with is a simple yet brutal catalogue of abuse, but unfortunately that is all it is. When Linda eventually leaves Chuck the story is rushed along with little time for complexity or subtleties to its un-compelling ending, we never really get to see what happened after. Surely a woman who endured that amount of abuse would have psychological problems, but this is never examined, instead it is neatly tied up in a bow for the sake of the narrative were we see Linda making amines with her parents in an all too obvious and clichéd conclusion.

chuck-traynor-and-linda-lovelace-scene-with-amanda seyfriedWhile the film does suffer from various issues it can be said its chief virtues are in its strong directing and its solid performances. Amanda Seyfried is effortlessly captivating in the role as Linda offering fragility to the character unmatched. Peter Sarsgaard is equally compelling as the abusive husband, Chuck Traynor. Sarsgaard brings an initial charm to the character that slowly develops into the twisted and threatening monster he becomes further into the narrative. Robert Patrick and the unrecognisable Sharon Stone are also solid in the small roles as Linda’s parents. The fact is, nobody across the whole cast puts in a performance short of fantastic.

In addition, the movie also pays great attention to the period detail, giving an accurate look and feel of the 70s era that many films struggle to recreate convincingly. Its refusal to linger on the sexy, flashy or gratuitous is also a good move from the directors, it instead makes Linda’s story the main focus of the film and is all the better for it.

Lovelace Review Allan Brown


Summary: Lovelace looks great and offers a plethora of rich performances, but beyond this the narrative simply isn’t compelling enough or presented with enough depth for the audience to fully engage or emotionally invest.


User Rating: 0 (0 votes)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About the Author

Despite my 9-5 being consumed by the daily duties of an Electrician, Movie Review World serves as a platform for me to share my thoughts, explorations and reflections on one of my biggest passions, film.

4 Responses to Lovelace Review

  1. Certainly seems like we watched the same film. It was all just too flimsy for what it needed to be. I agree that it basically got seduced by its own fun and energetic first half and then ran out of time to develop the dark side.

    • Yes it was all wrapped up just a little to quickly, with not nearly enough development for me to be fully involved in the story. Ah well, I guess there is always Boogie Nights to fill the void 😛

  2. CMrok93 says:

    Good review Allan. Never really went the extra-step to get us fully involved with the material or this story. It was just happening, and didn’t have much of a rhyme or reason as to why it mattered.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top ↑
  • Email Subscription

    Enter your email address to subscribe to Movie Review World and never miss another post.

  • Follow Me

  • Interviews

    Featuring Top 8/8 of Interviews


    Read more

  • Most Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Ken Roche on EIFF 2017: Fog In August Review (Nebel Im August)
    on The Iceman Review
    Jenny on EIFF 2015: Scottish Mussel Review
    Allan Brown on EIFF 2017: Romans Review
    Sharyl Lim on EIFF 2017: Romans Review
  • Hot Topics


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers:

Copy Protected by Chetan's WP-Copyprotect.